We're a mid-market firm with $200M in AUM. Are we too small for this kind of consulting?
Key takeaway: Mid-market firms are precisely who Kenmore was built for — and they see the highest ROI from practice consulting.
Firms in the $100M–$500M AUM range often see the highest return on practice consulting investment because they're large enough to have systemic process issues but haven't yet developed the internal infrastructure to address them. At this stage, a firm typically has 3–8 advisors managing between 150 and 600 client households, which means process inconsistencies multiply quickly across the team. Kenmore's engagements are scoped and priced for mid-market economics — not scaled-down versions of institutional frameworks that were never designed for your reality. A typical diagnostic engagement runs 4–6 weeks and delivers actionable recommendations, not a 200-page report that sits on a shelf.
The economics work in your favour. A $200M practice generating $1.5–$2M in annual revenue can typically absorb a diagnostic engagement fee while seeing measurable improvements in advisor capacity utilization, client retention, and compliance readiness within the first quarter after implementation. The return isn't theoretical — it shows up in fewer lost clients, reduced compliance remediation costs, and advisors spending more time on revenue-generating activity instead of administrative overhead.
Dr. Malcolm Kenmore founded this firm specifically because mid-market advisory practices were underserved by the consulting industry. The institutional consulting firms that serve Bay Street don't scale downward gracefully — and the dealer-provided resources don't scale upward at all. Kenmore occupies the space in between, and that space is exactly where a $200M firm sits.